|
|
|
Programme
rationale and outline
In order
to enhance the quality of the discussion and to select sections
of the extended field of Comparative Mythology that may resonate
broadly among the intended participants, the Conference programme
will be structured around the following four themes:
a.
Theoretical and methodological advances in the study of
Comparative Mythology
From
a somewhat antiquarian field of study evoking images of a dated
form of philological scholarship, Comparative Mythology has gone
through major developments in the last half century, due to
advances in structuralist anthropology; the study of oral
history, orality, textuality, performance, neurobiology, and the
philosophy of myth; the critique of Orientalism and the rise of
independent schools of mythological research outside the North
Atlantic; the critique of structural-functionalism and its
charter explanation by reference to relatively recent
events in terms, however, of mythical materials that are
demonstrably millennia old and have meta-regional, even
transcontinental distribution; the thinkability of global
contexts of analysis, suggested by present-day globalisation as
well as by state-of-the-art genetics and historical linguistics.
As a result, global approaches to the Deep History of the
mythology of Anatomically Modern Humans throughout a sizeable
part of their 200,000 years of existence have recently been
pioneered. But in the euphoria of such developments, a fresh look
at theory and method will help us to keep our feet to the ground,
and to identify growth-points for the near future.
b.
Mythological continuities between Africa and the other continents
Until
quite recently, African myths have been mainly studied from two
disparate perspectives: as historical charters for recent
socio-political arrangements, and as examples of performative
orality. To these lines of research, to which African scholars
have made a considerable contribution, recently a third line of
approach has been added. Comparative mythology, in conjunction
with genetics, comparative linguistics, comparative ethnography
and archaeology, is now exploring the possibility of
reconstructing the cultural history and hence the fundamental
connectedness, even unicity, of Anatomically Modern Humans beyond
the mere 5,000 years of documentary history. In this connection
the absolutely central place of sub-Saharan Africa in that global
cultural history has been highlighted: both before the
Out-of-Africa Exodus (c. 80,000 Before Present), and in
connection with the Back-into-Africa return migration
from Central and West Asia, from c. 15,000 years ago onwards.
African myths have been argued to hold the key to these two
patterns, since both would make us expect considerable
mythological continuity between sub-Saharan Africa, and the rest
of the Old World. Recently (e.g. during the First Annual Meeting
of the IACM) critical attention has been paid to the idea
(recently revived by Stephen Oppenheimer) according to which much
of the mythology of the Western Old World (i.e. West Asia, Africa
and Europe including the Bible, Ancient Near East, and
Graeco-Roman Antiquity) is a secondary restatement of much older
mythical material circulating in South East Asia since the early
Holocene (10,000 Before Present). Seeking to enlist senior
African researchers among the speakers, this section will
critically consider the three approaches and probe into their
complementarity.
c.
The mythology of dying and death
Myths
about how death came into the world exist in every society and
belong to the oldest known narratives in the world. The mystery
of death is the key to religion, many scholars have argued.
Comparative mythology can put the accompanying myths under
scrutiny. The mythology of dying and death, its variability as
well as similarities and resemblances across the globe and over
time, appears to be a good candidate to unravel major concerns of
humankind, particularly core values in life and beliefs about
people's destiny. Improved insights into these myths the
frequently recurring themes and their trajectories would
assist the interpretation of archaeological findings so often
resulting from mortuary practices of a deep history not to be
uncovered in any other way. And the finds vice versa might
provide clues to ancient myths or some of their themes. An
analysis of the existent corpus of myths surrounding dying and
death, including the ones entailing a personification of death or
ancestral wrongdoing, would bring out a (probably limited) set of
widespread ideas. To what extent these ideas can be detected in
contemporary understandings of dying and death is a further
question to be explored. The Finnish method (as well as
structuralist myth analysis and cultural contextualisations of
lived mythology) appears to be well suited for an approach to
this genre of myths.
d.
Present-day mythologies: globalisation, the market, identity,
conflict, evil and truth such mythemes as cosmoclasm, the
adversary, the trickster, panoptic omnipresence and omniscience,
the saviour, and world order, in the public discourse of the
early third millennium CE
In
modernist discourse, a myth is a collective representation which
science allows us to expose as an untruth; and mythology is the
antiquarian study of the untruths of the past, and of distant
places imperfectly domesticated into the modernist world order.
However, from an equally valid alternative (post-modern)
perspective, the claim of a privileged position (e.g. science)
from which truth can be established is in itself a myth
and, if transposed from the domain of science to that of
politics, ideology, identity and world religions, it is such
claims that have made for the devastating conflicts rocking the
world in the late 20th and early 21st centuries. Viewed from this
perspective, comparative mythology, far from being antiquarian,
appears as a royal road to the understanding of
systems of symbolic legitimation and persuasion in the world
today. The mythemes listed in the title of this section have a
wide applicability, from militant Islam to the Christian right;
from popular media images of world doom and world control to
saviour figures such as Harry Potter, Frodo Baggins and current
world leaders; from the Internet to pop stars; from paradisiacal
freedom and leisure to panoptical surveillance and total
unfreedom as inside the ogres belly, etc. Contributions are
invited that take these themes beyond the journalistic platitudes
they could easily remain, and achieve some depth in confronting
their comparative and theoretical implications for an
understanding of todays global movements in the light of
the time-honoured themes of Comparative Mythology.
e.
Work in progress
Not
all significant developments in recent Comparative Mythology can
be subsumed under the above four headings. Moreover, not all
contributions to the conference will need to be of the full-paper
format (i.e. a one-hour slot with discussant, on the basis of a
pre-circulated paper). In the Work in Progress section,
shorter papers and posters will be accommodated. This also opens
the opportunity for researchers from the Netherlands to join us,
share their ongoing work with us and contribute to our
discussions even though they cannot participate in the conference
for the full three days. (Please note: Senior
researchers resident in the Netherlands are very much invited to
go for full conference participation through the submission of
standard proposals for sections a-d).
f.
Business meetings: Annual Meeting of the International
Association for Comparative Mythology
Papers
are to be made available for the conference website no later than
10 days before the first conference day. The website will be
password protected and (initially) only open to participants.
Each full
paper will be introduced for 5-10 minutes by the author, and
formally discussed by a discussant for another 5-10 minutes,
after which the remaining time of the one-hour slot for each
paper will be used for intensive general discussion. Format of
shorter papers, and posters, still to be defined.
Programme outline (provisional)
| day
1: |
|
| 10.00
3
full papers |
a1.
Theoretical and methodological advances in the study of
Comparative Mythology |
| 13.00
lunch |
|
| 14.00
3
full papers |
a2.
Theoretical and methodological advances in the study of
Comparative Mythology |
| 18.00
drinks |
|
| 19.00
dinner |
|
| day
2: |
|
| 10.00
3
full papers |
b.
Mythological continuities between Africa and the other
continents |
| 13.00
lunch |
|
| 14.00
short
papers and posters |
e1.
Work in progress |
| 18.00
drinks |
|
| 19.00
dinner |
|
| day
3 |
|
| 10.00
3
full papers |
c.
The mythology of dying and death |
| 13.00
lunch |
|
| 14.00
3
full papers |
d.
Present-day mythologies: globalisation, the market,
identity, conflict, evil and truth such mythemes
as cosmoclasm, the adversary, the trickster, panoptic
omnipresence and omniscience, the saviour, and world
order, in the public discourse of the early third
millennium CE |
| 18.00
closure |
return to index page or hit the RETURN button of your browser
bravenet.com